While a majority of the icy deposits on the moon are likely billions of years old, some may be much more recent, according to new research.
The discovery of ice deposits in craters scattered across the moon’s south pole has helped to renew interest in exploring the lunar surface, but no one is sure exactly when or how that ice got there.
Lead author Ariel Deutsch, a graduate student in the earth, environmental, and planetary sciences department at Brown University, says that constraining the ages of the deposits is important both for basic science and for future lunar explorers who might make use of that ice for fuel and other purposes.
“The ages of these deposits can potentially tell us something about the origin of the ice, which helps us understand the sources and distribution of water in the inner solar system,” Deutsch says. “For exploration purposes, we need to understand the lateral and vertical distributions of these deposits to figure out how best to access them. These distributions evolve with time, so having an idea of the age is important.”
How old is the ice on the moon?
Using data from NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, which has been orbiting the moon since 2009, the researchers looked at the ages of the large craters in which scientists found evidence for south pole ice deposits. To date the craters, researchers count the number of smaller craters that have accrued inside the larger ones. Scientists have an approximate idea of the pace of impacts over time, so counting craters can help establish the ages of terrains.
The majority of the reported ice deposits are within large craters formed about 3.1 billion years or longer ago, the researchers found. Since the ice can’t be any older than the crater, that puts an upper bound on the age of the ice. Just because the crater is old doesn’t mean that the ice within it is also that old too, the researchers say, but in this case there’s reason to believe the ice is indeed old. The deposits have a patchy distribution across crater floors, which suggests that micrometeorite impacts and other debris has battered the ice over a long period of time.
If those reported ice deposits are indeed ancient, that could have significant implications in terms of exploration and potential resource utilization, the researchers say.
“There have been models of bombardment through time showing that ice starts to concentrate with depth,” Deutsch says. “So if you have a surface layer that’s old, you’d expect more underneath.”
Craters in craters
While the majority of ice was in the ancient craters, the researchers also found evidence for ice in smaller craters that, judging by their sharp, well-defined features, appear to be quite fresh. That suggests that some of the deposits on the south pole got there relatively recently.
“That was a surprise,” Deutsch says. “There hadn’t really been any observations of ice in younger cold traps before.”
If there are indeed deposits of different ages, the researchers say, that suggests they may also have different sources. Older ice could have been sourced from water-bearing comets and asteroids impacting the surface, or through volcanic activity that drew water from deep within the moon. But there aren’t many big water-bearing impactors around in recent times, and volcanism is thought to have ceased on the Moon over a billion years ago. So more recent ice deposits would require different sources—perhaps bombardment from pea-sized micrometeorites or implantation by solar wind.
The best way to find out for sure, the researchers say, is to send spacecraft there to get some samples. And that appears to be on the horizon. NASA’s Artemis program aims to put humans on the moon by 2024, and plans to fly numerous precursor missions with robotic spacecraft in the meantime. Coauthor Jim Head, Deutsch’s PhD advisor, says studies like this one will help to shape those future missions.
“When we think about sending humans back to the moon for long-term exploration, we need to know what resources are there that we can count on, and we currently don’t know,” Head says. “Studies like this one help us make predictions about where we need to go to answer those questions.”