In general, life is better when its kept simple. A process with three steps looks more appealing than one with ten elements. For this reason, we seek out methods to save us time, energy, money, and anything else that’s precious to us.
On the one hand, we do this by being more efficient, or by finding shortcuts that get the job done but in an easier way or in less time. This can create an efficiency mindset where we look for ways to make every task simpler so that it can be done sooner.
As the saying goes, good things come to those who wait. This is a reminder that in life, there are some things that can’t be rushed. Sometimes that’s because the process should be enjoyed; other times, it’s because complicated issues require sophisticated solutions. Here are three such examples where a short cut could do more harm than good.
When it comes to filling out a tax return or dealing with an audit, there’s no way to diminish the receipts, paperwork, and the numbers involved. The process is set by third parties, and while you don’t have to complete it alone, it isn’t a good idea to take shortcuts.
Calling in professional help, especially when dealing with an audit, is recommended because the answer to a demanding task is expertise instead of simplification. Sam Faris from
Fariscpa.com recommends “a sophisticated approach and process for fighting complex audits.” This can turn owing thousands of dollars into owing a few hundred dollars or even nothing.
Shortcuts are great for speedy solutions, but there are times when being thorough will produce better results. Unlike the sophisticated approach in the example above, the reason for not taking a shortcut here is about putting in more time. The hiring process can benefit from those leading it to pause and be thorough.
The first place this can save money is in meeting business needs. The process should start by thinking about the business needs. This will allow any company to identify the skills and personality they need, not just to get the job done, but to fit into the organization. This information can be used to tailor the job advert and its location to attract the right candidates, and the interviewers will know what they’re looking for.
Not taking a shortcut on identifying needs means that money isn’t wasted on job adverts in the wrong places, time isn’t lost interviewing candidates who are wholly unsuitable, and training and resources can be given to someone that will serve the company well.
Health And Safety
The examples so far have looked at complex and thorough approaches. The third point focuses on when there shouldn’t be a shortcut on costs. One example is maintenance; paying a bit up front makes more sense than having to replace all of the office equipment after a pipe burst.
Another time when cutting corners can be costly is health and safety. Whether it’s training, equipment, or risk assessments, the smallest things can have the biggest impact. That means setting the budget for health and safety can be tricky. Quality products are essential, particularly when it comes to PPE or personal protection equipment.
The Bottom Line
Efficiency is necessary, and the word shortcut doesn’t need to be a bad thing. However, there are times when a sophisticated approach is the best way to deal with something. In certain circumstances, being thorough really pays off, and there are definitely times when spending can save you from bigger and more costly issues.